Vaccines-Government Launches Deceptive Swine Flu PropogandaPRN

Vaccines-Government Launches Deceptive Swine Flu PropogandaPRN

Government Launches Deceptive Swine Flu Propaganda BlitzTo Counter Growing Criticism from Scientific and Medical CommunityRichard Gale & Gary Null, Ph.D.Progressive Radio Network, October 26, 2009President Obama and his top health officials are engaging in a major public relations effort to divert attention away from whether the swineflu vaccine is effective and safe,to whether there is enough of the vaccine to go around. And the media, as usual,is cooperating fully. This echoes the way media debatewas manipulated during the Vietnam and Iraq Wars. Instead of debating whether we should even be fighting those wars, the media debated whetherwe were using the correct military strategy.Increasing numbers of scientists and doctors are issuing harsh criticisms of the government’s plan to vaccinate (forcibly if necessary) virtually the entire U.S. population with what they claim is a poorly tested vaccine that is not only ineffective against swine flu, but could cripple and even kill many more people than it helps. The CDC’s public relations campaign has been running “scare” ads that portray swine flu as a full-blown “pandemic,” responsible for snuffing out countless lives, and unlessit isstopped by universal vaccination, could kill millions of American citizens. But scientists and health officials throughout the world have called the government’s claims unjustified and deliberately misleading.For example, Dr. Anthony Morris,a distinguished virologist and former Chief Vaccine Office at the FederalDrugAdministration (FDA), states that,“There is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza” and that “The producers of these vaccines know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”And in November 2007, the UK newspaper The Scotsman, made public warnings by the inventor of the “flu jab,” Dr. Graeme Laver. Dr. Laver was a major Australian scientist involved in the invention of a flu vaccine, in addition to playing a leading scientific role in the discovery of anti-flu drugs. He went on record as saying the vaccine he helped to create was ineffective and that natural infection with the flu was safer. “I have never been impressed with its efficacy,” said Dr. Laver.W e hear the assumption being made by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)that the number of deaths from the H1N1 virus is at pandemic levels and now a “national emergency.” One would assume that with all of its resources, the New York Times, in its October 26thfront page story on the CDC’s statistics,would be accuratewith the statistics that the swine flu caused20,000 hospitalizations and 1,000 deaths.However, this is all fiction. And it is a fiction based solely upon the CDC’s own contradictory statements and actions. Our independentinvestigations into the clinical trials and statistical studies of influenza vaccines reveal glaring discrepancies. Let us not forget that it isthis s a m eNew York Times, with its “star” reporter Judith Miller thatl e d A m erica into believing that Saddam Hu s sein possessed weapons of mass destruction, tried to purchase yellow cakeuraniumfrom Niger,and had dealings with al-Qaeda. And let us also remember that it is the same CDCand health officials in Washington, includingPresident Ford and his top health advisor Joseph Califano, who pushedthrough and propagandizedan untested vaccine during the 1976 swine flu scare,

Share this post